Subscribe to Blog via Email
-
Recent Posts
Categories
- 3D Modeling
- 3D Printing
- Admin
- Agriculture
- AI
- airborne LiDAR
- AR/VR
- archaeology
- art
- artifical perception
- artificial intelligence
- atmospheric
- Augmented reality
- Autonomous vehicles
- bathymetric
- BIM
- Business Development
- BVLOS
- Cepton
- Certifications
- Civil Engineering
- Cloud
- computer vision
- Conferences
- Construction
- Consumer
- Covid-19
- cultural heritage
- Data
- Deep Learning
- DIAL
- Digital Transformation
- driverless vehicles
- Drones
- Education
- Entertainment
- Environmental
- Feature Extraction
- Flash LiDAR
- Forensics
- Forestry
- Forums
- Full waveform
- Games
- geodetic
- Geomatics
- GIS
- GNSS
- Government
- GPS
- Ground penetrating radar
- Hardware
- Historic Preservation
- Hydrographic LiDAR
- Indoor Mapping
- Infrastructure
- Inspection
- intelligent cities
- Internet of Things
- Laser Scanning
- Lidar
- LN Video of the Month
- machine learning
- Mapping
- Marketing
- medical
- Metrology
- military
- Mining
- Mobile LiDAR
- Online surveys
- Open Source
- Orgs
- Photogrammetry
- point clouds
- Quality
- Radar
- remote sensing
- Research
- reverse engineering
- Robots
- Rowing
- Safety
- satellites
- Security
- Sensors
- SLAM
- smart cities
- Software
- solid state
- solid state lidar
- Standards
- Structure from motion
- Surveying
- Surveying Engineering
- Technology
- The Industry
- topography
- training
- UAS
- UAVs
- Uncategorized
- Uncertainty
- US Army
- virtual reality
- Visualization
- visualizationj
- Weather
- Wind LiDAR
- Young Geospatial Professional
Archives
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
Tag Archives: FGDC
Surveying Control – Its Misuse and Effects on Accuracy
One of the most important concepts in surveying is the principle that surveying control should be significantly more accurate than the actual survey. Some say it should be twice as accurate, some say an order of magnitude. In many cases … Continue reading →
Posted in 3D Modeling, airborne LiDAR, Geomatics, Laser Scanning, Lidar, Mapping, Metrology, Mobile LiDAR, Standards, Surveying, Surveying Engineering, The Industry, UAS, UAVs
|
Tagged ASPRS, control surveys, FGDC, NGS
|
1 Comment
3D Positional Uncertainty and Accuracy Webinar Recap
The webinar on 3D positional uncertainty and accuracy seemed to be well received. There was an excellent level of registrations. Attendance was good and the request for additional information were amazing. For those who were unable to register click here … Continue reading →
Posted in 3D Modeling, Data, Education, geodetic, Geomatics, GPS, Quality, Standards, Surveying, Surveying Engineering, The Industry
|
Tagged error propagation, FGDC, NGS, specifications
|
Leave a comment