Camera is Much More Sensitive to Laser Pulses

An engineer at CES last week was very disappointed to find that his  new $1,998 Sony a7R II mirrorless camera had been permanently damaged by an automotive lidar sensor.

From an article in PetaPixel

Photo of Car Camera Damaged by Lidar

Camera Damaged by Lidar

Self-driving cars widely use a technology called lidar (which stands for light detection and ranging) to “see” the world using laser pulses. These lasers are designed to be safe to human eyes, but it seems they may not always be safe for cameras. A man at CES in Las Vegas says that a car-mounted lidar permanently damaged the sensor in his new $1,998 Sony a7R II mirrorless camera.

Ars Technica reports that Ridecell autonomous vehicle engineer Jit Ray Chowdhur had been photographing a self-driving car that was using a lidar system developed by AEye.

He was then horrified to find that all his subsequent photos showed clear sensor damage — there were two bright purple spots with horizontal and vertical lines across the entire frame.

“I noticed that all my pictures were having that spot,” Chowdhur tells Ars. “I covered up the camera with the lens cap and the spots are there—it’s burned into the sensor.”

AEye CEO Weighs In

AEye CEO Luis Dussan tells Ars that his company’s lidars are completely safe for human eyes but didn’t deny that they are capable of damaging camera sensors.

“Cameras are up to 1000x more sensitive to lasers than eyeballs,” Dussan tells Ars. “Occasionally, this can cause thermal damage to a camera’s focal plane array.”

There may soon be an explosion of self-driving cars (and lidars) on public roads, so whether the lasers pose any danger to things like cameras is something that will need to be looked into.

Lasers have long been known to pose a risk to cameras, and there are many documented cases online of sensors being damaged by the types commonly used in concert light shows. Here is an example:

AEye claims its lidar has more range than competitors’ systems thanks to the use of a powerful laser. Different lidar systems feature different designs and lasers, so many or most of them may be completely safe for cameras as well.

Warning Recommended

“This sensor damage was an effect of a combination of things — intensity, amount of time, spot size, wavelength, pulsing, [etc.],” Chowdhur tells PetaPixel. “I have tested and photographed almost all lidars up close without getting my camera damaged. Also, this may not happen at a distance.”

Chowdhur also notes that AEye’s lidar may not be the only one on the market that poses a risk to camera sensors.

“It is unfortunate that I discovered this with their lidar,” Chowdhur says. “A warning from them when I asked permission from them for photographing their system would have been ideal.”

AEye has since offered to cover the cost of Chowdhur’s fried camera, and the engineer says he says he will accept the “generous” gesture as his camera was only a month old and was a big investment.

“I do want all lidar companies to mention in specs how camera safe they are in some units, like say distance vs camera aperture, shutter speed,” Chowdhur says. “Or what kind of filters to use or if they have completely mitigated the problem.”

For more information click here.

Note – If you liked this post click here to stay informed of all of the 3D laser scanning, geomatics, UAS, autonomous vehicle, Lidar News and more. If you have an informative 3D video that you would like us to promote, please forward to editor@lidarnews.com and if you would like to join the Younger Geospatial Professional movement click here.

This entry was posted in Autonomous vehicles, Conferences, Consumer, Laser Scanning, Lidar, Sensors, solid state, solid state lidar, Technology, The Industry and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.